The significance of the distinction between "having a life" vs. "being alive" in end-of-life care.

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Medicine, health care, and philosophy

Abstract

In end-of-life care discussions, I contend that the distinction between "having a life" vs. "being alive" is an underutilized distinction. This distinction is significant in separating different states of existence conflated by patients, families, and clinicians. In the clinical setting, applying this distinction in end-of-life care discussions aids patients' and family members' decision-making by helping them understand that being alive can differ from having a life. Moreover, this distinction helps them decide which state may be the most important to them. After applying this distinction to three complex cases, I respond to the likely objection that "having a life" vs. "being alive" is less accurate and more controversial than other distinctions. I conclude by arguing that "having a life" vs. "being alive" is more accurate and less controversial than distinctions between medically indicated vs. medically inappropriate treatments, personhood, and quantity vs. quality of life.

First Page

251

Last Page

258

DOI

10.1007/s11019-022-10066-3

Publication Date

6-1-2022

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS