Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are sparse high-quality safety and effectiveness data for pulsed field ablation (PFA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF), in which lesions beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are often placed. In addition, no large trials have used insertable cardiac monitors for continuous rhythm monitoring after ablation in patients with PerAF or after PFA in any atrial fibrillation population. In Phase 2 of the ADVANTAGE AF study (A Prospective Single Arm Open Label Study of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System in Subjects With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation), patients with PerAF underwent PFA for PVI and posterior wall ablation (PWA) and, in a subcohort, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter.

METHODS: Patients with PerAF underwent PVI and posterior wall ablation with the pentaspline PFA catheter and cavotricuspid isthmus with a novel focal-linear PFA catheter after intravenous nitroglycerin prophylaxis. Patients were followed up for 1 year with continuous rhythm monitoring after ablation with insertable cardiac monitors to emulate traditional intermittent monitoring for the primary efficacy end point and to examine atrial arrhythmia (AA) burden and episode duration.

RESULTS: This 255-patient cohort (age, 66.7±9.3 years; female, 29%; CHA

CONCLUSIONS: In Phase 2 of ADVANTAGE AF, the first multicenter PerAF study of PFA with continuous rhythm monitoring: (1) cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with nitroglycerin prophylaxis was safe and effective, (2) PVI plus posterior wall ablation was safe and effective, and (3) an AA burden < 0.1% and AA episode < 1 hour duration were end points associated with the lowest health care use.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05443594.

First Page

27

Last Page

40

DOI

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074485

Publication Date

7-8-2025

Included in

Cardiology Commons

Share

COinS