A pilot study examining experiential learning vs didactic education of abdominal compartment syndrome.
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
American journal of surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current surgical education relies on simulated educational experiences or didactic sessions to teach low-frequency clinical events such as abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate if simulation would improve performance and knowledge retention of ACS better than a didactic lecture.
METHODS: Nineteen general surgery residents were block randomized by postgraduate year level to a didactic or a simulation session. After 3 months, all residents completed a knowledge assessment before participating in an additional simulation. Two independent reviewers assessed resident performance via audio-video recordings.
RESULTS: No baseline differences in ACS experience were noted between groups. The observational evaluation demonstrated a significant difference in performance between the didactic and simulation groups: 9.9 vs 12.5, P = .037 (effect size = 1.15). Knowledge retention was equivalent between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that simulation-based education may be more effective for teaching the basic concepts of ACS.
First Page
358
Last Page
364
DOI
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.011
Publication Date
8-1-2017
Recommended Citation
Saraswat A, Bach J, Watson WD, Elliott JO, Dominguez EP. A pilot study examining experiential learning vs didactic education of abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 4. PMID: 27771036.